I got a question
> Dear Pekka
>I wish to have more informations about “lecture
> diary” method, because this is the first time that I do it.
> In particular, can you suggest me a good way to proceed in order to
> write the diary? Do my thoughts and ideas must be write like an essay or
> do they must be separated each for one lecture? What exactly do I have
> to write in the diary?
Dear X.X,
if you think about the lecture diary from the point of view of an examiner of this kind of internet lecture, where there is no direct contact between people except email in some cases, the examiner needs
1. proof that you have listened to the lectures,
2. understood the contents, and
3. reflected on the lectures in your mind, so that hopefully something stays there afterwards.
Thus you need
1. to touch with at least a few sentences all individual lectures; more those that interested you, less those that you did not find so important, but anyway all of them;
2. give attention to concepts, because exact use of concepts is a proof of understanding, while simple enumeration of a few concrete details does not prove it very convincingly, and
3. put occasionally something from your mind into the text; can be reflections, comments, criticism or whatever, as long as it comes from your mind and is sensible.
The length of the lecture diary is not long, 5 pages. One reason of course is simple laziness of the examiner: I will get a hefty pile of diaries from seven different universities through three different cooperation schemes. The other reason is that the limit forces writers to concentrate on points 2 and 3, because you will have to plan your text, not just execute a writing assignment while reading. I would advice you to make notes while you listen, plan the length of how much you write of any individual lecture, and then write. You can of course listen again individual lectures when you need to refresh something. You are free to structure and compose the lecture diary as you wish; no set formula for that.
Pekka